Saturday, 7 March 2015

Shinra Technologies Next-Gen Multiplayer Cloud Gaming Demo

Shinra Technologies, a cloud gaming startup company operating under the umbrella of Square Enix, has demonstrated their impressive multiplayer cloud gaming tech at GDC 2015. You can see a video of that demo below.

The Shinra tech is the kind of stuff that cloud gaming advocates' dreams are made of, with the world simulation running on a cloud supercomputer in a data center and being rendered and streamed to 64 player viewports. In the demo you can see a highly detailed world with the size of 1000 square kilometers containing 1 million trees and 16000 AI characters.

And the world is also very dynamic with real-time terrain deformation and massive physics simulations supporting things like expansive fluid simulations. The demonstrator also mentioned that they use NVIDIA's TITAN Black GPU for the simulations because of its large frame buffer, so the upcoming TITAN X, built on NVIDIA's Maxwell architecture and with double the memory of TITAN Black, should come very handy for Shinra.

Wednesday, 26 March 2014

Have Professional Reviewers Intentionally Sacked Ryse and the Fun in Gaming

I'll intentionally start from the gamers' viewpoint. Yes, I have intentions. Lately I've been asking myself if I have fun playing video games. The Witcher, a highly praised game, is the last thing I brought myself to try and then brought myself to play on and on. Till I stopped and don't know if I'll continue it. Doesn't sound like I had fun?

Well, I've beat many games that I hadn't fun playing. Beat that game, made a check mark. From Elder Scrolls to Call of Duty, yes I once brought myself to beat a Call of Duty game. Of course I try to remember when is the last time I had fun playing a game. As I recall I had fun playing many of my SNES games, my first PC game Wing Commander IV, Archimedean Dynasty, Terra Nova, Red Alert and many other RTS games of that time. I guess every gamer has a time when he likes what he's playing or should I say, like in my case, he likes the virtual worlds born in the imagination of game developers that he gets transported to.

I bought my first PC because I saw a PC gaming magazine that a classmate let me read. Oh the wonders I saw in that magazine. But when I got my shiny and expensive new PC with Pentium inside after a lot of let's say persuasion of my parents, I forgot the gaming magazines and just gamed. I chose my games based on the pretty covers and descriptions on the back. There were duds and there were shining beacons among them. After getting a game, the duds were weeded out in no time. I still regret exchanging Archimedean Dynasty for a dud that I can't remember with a classmate. Every time I went into my local game shop I was in anticipation what wonders it will bring into my life.

But then life changed, the world changed. There were more and more games, which also means more duds, one could get pirate CD copies of games and the internet was coming. My local game shop closed, did I help kill it? Through pirate CD copies and later Warez downloads I consumed more games than ever. Then came Steam and now cloud gaming, it's easier and easier to consume games. And of course I read game magazines and game reviews. I don't know if fear of giving money for duds brought this upon me, or simply me changing with the world. Fun with games was getting less and less.

It seems to me that I now read more game reviews and previews online that I game. I know almost everything about a game before I play it and it looks to me that I have formed an opinion on a game before I play it based on online reviews, previews and other information. The crowdfunding wonder Star Citizen has made a game out of releasing information about the development of its universe and I look upon it as the next big thing that will give me fun and transport me to another world. Will Chris Roberts bring my fun and sense of wonder back? Looks like many gamers are like me based on the money that Star Citizen is getting.

I also frequent gaming forums like IGN, GameSpot and NeoGAF. Do you know that GameSpot has a subforum named System Wars? It's even the most frequented one there. One would think this has to be a very successful game, System Wars sounds very similar to Star Wars, so could be a space game. But when you enter that forum you notice very fast that other systems are at war there. There fight modern gaming crusaders under the banner of gaming systems. PlayStation is killing the Xbox, and Xbox is slaughtering the PC. Nintendo they don't even take seriously anymore.

IGN is not much different and NeoGAF is more the place of the backstabby passive-aggressive diplomat type that hopes to lure the enemy over to his side with a well informed opinion.

What are the weapons of these modern crusaders, the system warriors. Metascores, game previews and technical analysis a la Digital Foundry. And of course a lot of name calling, which former Microsoft man Adam Orth can say a word or two about. The words toxicity and troll are often associated with these system war arenas. The word fun is not often used there, could it be that you can't fight with something that you don't have?

Let me now come to the professional game reviewers, and I call most of them that way because they are paid for that. Do they turn which way the wind blows? Bam, I started with the hammer.

Last year was again the launch of a new generation of consoles, and the flames of war burned hotter than ever. There was aggression, even the passive-aggressive type, there was hate. And there were victims. The victim of the last generation launch was Sony, this time it was Microsoft that made blunder after blunder and made life easier for Sony to win the PR war at launch.

The Sony win was so big that the SDF (Sony Defense Force) is still overwhelming the forums, game review comments and articles about the consoles and their games. The Xbots are on the retreat, afraid of the SDF. The SDF is full of praise of almost every move that Sony make, one could call them PSbots, religiously following their leaders like the Manson family.

And the gaming press went where the wind was blowing. You could read digital rights bla bla bla, Kinect privacy bla bla bla. Some lords of war at Microsoft had to go because of this defeat and some Xbox One games fell victim. I'm concentrating on the highest profile launch victim here, namely Ryse: Son of Rome.

The game was first presented at E3 last year, so after the shitstorm that was the unveiling of the new Xbox. And right away Ryse was labeled by the gaming press as QTE bla bla bla, repetitive bla bla bla, boring bla bla bla. Some of the gaming press chose to ignore the game or only mentioned it casually. It got the lovely nickname Ryse: Son of QTE by the SDF.

You could almost feel the fear of the SDF and some of the gaming press that went where the wind was blowing. Would Ryse get great reviews the tide of battle could turn and the gaming press would look like amateurish idiots. First and foremost Ryse's unmatched graphics and high production values made them nervous. What if a good game was hiding under that shiny surface?

Then the reviews of Ryse came in, and they were devastating. All the press were tooting in the same horn, boring with a bad combat system, repetitive, QTE, bad story, pretty but nothing to write about. The Adam Sesslers were having dissertations on how historically inaccurate it is, and so on. As often, the one black sheep was Kotaku whose reviewer dared to voice his honest opinion and write that Ryse was fun and he recommends it to gamers. He was promptly flamed by the SDF.

As the best looking console launch game, the Xbots of course used Ryse as their weapon of choice in the battle of which system is more powerful. The SDF countered violently with Killzone: Shadow Fall. A game that has higher resolution simply can't look worse than a low res launch game from the weakly Xbone. If they had to retreat from that argument, they of course countered with Metascores. Some more passive-aggressive SDF types praise Ryse for its looks but at the same time don't forget to patronizingly mention that it's still second to Killzone: Shadow Fall or inFamous: Second Son.

Just so it happened that, regardless of bad Metascore, some Xbox One gamers picked up Ryse, and surprise surprise, it was fun. Mind you, many first simply didn't dare to write fun, but used adjectives like guilty pleasure and mindless fun to not get flamed. Some admitted completing the game multiple times in contrast to some games that got glowing reviews. On the higher difficulties the game also required strategy to survive. And surprise, the combat system was more realistic than other so called hack and slash games a la God of War, and even the Dark Souls combat looks somewhat crude in execution when you compare it.

Luckily many more gamers dared not to listen to reviews and discovered that Ryse is a lot of fun. Simply poking at the Amazon game reviews you see that people have a lot of fun with the game and the game is very popular among the gamers who bought it at the Xbox One digital store. Some gamers ask themselves what were the reviewers smoking when they played Ryse, or if they even played it at all.

Seeing the tired faces of game reviewers at the consoles' launch I would say that they sure had to play a lot, the question is how much of that was Ryse. That's simply a guess, could it be that Ryse was anyways labeled as boring, repetitive, soulless since E3, so why bother if I have so much work? Why not just rehash all the labeling? Well, some of the gaming news outlets like IGN latter retracted on the harsh criticism and admitted that the game was fun. But mostly they were concerned that gamers forget Ryse and the reviews, they thought that who wants to bother with that unimportant game and we could be labeled as amateurish idiots or worse, hype followers.

One thing that is even worse to say for a professional game critic is that he lost fun playing games, or he never had it. Then they are unusable in gamers' minds, why listen to him if he does it for the money or his ego.

Should professional game critics ask themselves if they have fun gaming? Should you play video games because well it's a habit, who needs fun? Everyone has to answer these questions for himself. I know that if I want the mystery of new games to return I should stop looking for reviews, previews, yes even stop peeking at the final scores. And fun is not what I'll find in gaming forums, well sometimes it can be fun, but for the wrong reasons.

Saturday, 8 March 2014

OnLive Relaunched with CloudLift and OnLive Go

After OnLive went through ABC bankruptcy and its assets were purchased by Lauder Partners for $4.8 million in 2012, the company went into hibernation mode and started to rebuild. Now the time has come when they are showing the fruits of their labor, as they have relaunched with two new services named CloudLift and OnLive Go. They have also relocated from Palo Alto, California to Mountain View, California, and launched an official OnLive forum at

On the CloudLift service OnLive has partnered with Steam, with possible future partnerships with other digital game services like EA's Origin and Ubisoft's Uplay. With CloudLift gamers can sync their Steam games library Steam Cloud game saves with the OnLive cloud gaming service and play their games via interactive video streaming on PCs, Macs, TVs and Android mobiles. The OnLive Android App has also been updated to version 1.4 to accommodate the new CloudLift functionality. OnLive still hasn't made it to iOS devices like iPhones and iPads with Apple still refusing to let them in.

CloudLift is priced at $14.99 per month in the US and Canada, and at £9.99 per month in the UK. The list of CloudLift supported games is currently very limited with 20 games, but OnLive is in active negotitations with many game publishers and they intend to add dozens more games in short order. There is a 7-day free trial for CloudLift and gamers can also directly buy the CloudLift supported games from OnLive and get a Steam download code for them. This greatly mitigates the fear of gamers not having a product that they can own should the company go bust.

OnLive has stated that they have improved the on-boarding process for games, so very little to no modifying is necessary to bring games to OnLive. This should allow OnLive to deliver games on their retail launch dates and is a huge improvement over the cumbersome porting process of old OnLive that required a large games on-boarding team at OnLive. The limited games library was one, if not the, stumbling block of old OnLive that caused limited appeal to gamers.

The list of supported games may be short, but there are quite a few interesting among them. The 20 CloudLift supported games are: Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition, Batman: Arkham City - Game of the Year Edition, Batman: Arkham Origins, Saints Row IV, Dead Island: Game of the Year Edition, Dead Island: Riptide, Darksiders II, Metro 2033, Mortal Kombat Komplete Edition, The LEGO Movie - Videogame, LEGO The Lord of the Rings, Red Faction: Armageddon, MX vs ATV Reflex, Painkiller: Hell and Damnation, Strike Suit Zero, Truck Racer, Scribblenauts Unlimited, Type:Rider, The Raven - Legacy of a Master Thief and The Book of Unwritten Tales: The Critter Chronicles. Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment and Deep Silver have returned with their games, and even brought some new ones, after they removed their games from OnLive in fall 2012 following the troubles of old OnLive.

OnLive's CloudLift enabled multiplayer games now work like normal PC games and you can play with your friends on Steam. This is also a huge improvement for new OnLive. On old OnLive gamers only had the choice of playing multiplayer games with other OnLive gamers which severely limited their choices. This was another stumbling block for old OnLive, and not only that, old OnLive even had to touch the source code of games to get the multiplayer running on their closed system which resulted in many games that normally supported multiplayer coming without it to OnLive. Looks like CloudLift uses the Steam version of games as the OnLive CloudLift page says that the games use the SteamWorks DRM.

OnLive is also keeping their $9.99 (£6.99, €9.99) per month PlayPack plan of over 250 games. The PlayPass option for purchasing single games has been removed, though the games that people have already purchased are theirs to keep.

The other new service from OnLive, namely OnLive Go, is a B2B offering. This means that other companies can use OnLive's infrastructure and cloud gaming know-how. In this case the first company that has partnered with OnLive is Linden Lab, the creators of virtual world Second Life. They've launched an app named SL Go. You can get it for Android mobile platforms, or you can run Second Life via OnLive on PCs, Macs and TVs. Second Life on SL Go has the graphics settings dialed to the maximum, so depending on how good your PC is it can look even better on an Android tablet than your PC. Second Life on SL Go is also touch enabled so you can control your virtual avatar via touch controls.

OnLive Go, including SL Go, lets you rent the way an internet café would, only it gives the freedom to use it anywhere that you have high bandwidth internet, Wi-Fi and 4G included. In the case of SL Go it costs $3.00 per hour to stream the virtual world of Second Life to a device of your choice.

OnLive has also partnered with Gaijin Entertainment and will enable cloud video streaming of their free to play MMO War Thunder via OnLive Go.

To enable the new services OnLive has added thousands of new servers to their existing data centers in the San Francisco Bay Area, Dallas, Virginia and Luxembourg. They've also opened two new data centers in Seattle and Chicago, and upgraded the existing servers with the latest CPUs, GPUs and other hardware.

OnLive is still supporting their own hardware accessories. They are selling the OnLive Game System for $99.99 and the Universal OnLive Wireless Controller for $49.99.

OnLive has also revamped their leadership. Lead investor Gary Lauder stepped down from his role as chairman and hired Mark Jung as executive chairman. Mark was co-founder and CEO of IGN, which he built into a digital entertainment powerhouse. After taking the company public in 2000 and then private in 2003, Mark led IGN’s sale for over $650 million to News Corp, the parent company of Fox Interactive Media in 2005. Subsequently, he was the COO of Fox Interactive Media (FIM), where he was responsible for all of its internet properties including MySpace, IGN Entertainment,,, and Scout Media. After that Mark was the CEO of VUDU, a leading provider of digital home entertainment and interactive television services.

Joining him are Don Gordon as SVP of engineering. Don was a VP at Gracenote, held executive level positions at Microsoft and holds 55 issued US patents related to video technology. Carrie Holder as VP of business development, before that she was director of partner management at EA. And Rick Sanchez as VP of product & marketing, who was also a co-founder of IGN. Most recently, he was VP of Playdom at Disney Interactive.

From the old guard of OnLive there remain Tom Paquin as EVP and chief technology officer, and Bruce Grove as general manager of OnLive UK.

The new leadership of OnLive acknowledges a humbler OnLive that wants to work with other platform holders like Valve and being an enabler of business opportunities for other companies. As opposed to the OnLive of old that seemingly went against everyone and everything, impersonated by its founder and former CEO Steve Perlman, which was also one of the causes of their demise.

OnLive's new business model may prove successful, but business models aren't enough. And not every change is necessarily for the better. Judging from OnLive's new user interface that is now built with HTML5 and takes some lessons from Microsoft's Metro design that is geared towards touch interfaces, they have some work before them to make it user friendly and good looking. The new interface may look stylish, but it also can run painfully slow and finding what you're looking for can be difficult as there is occasionally so much information displayed that you can be overwhelmed and not know where to navigate next. It might be that the initial load of the OnLive relaunch is putting the strain on the interface servers.

Gone is the cool OnLive Arena where you could move between the different live video feeds of gameplay of various games, you can now only spectate other gamers under the game you've selected. The cool looking OnLive start up sequence where the camera moved through the OnLive logo to reveal a giant planetary grid made of gameplay videos was replaced with a hip looking video of colored OnLive logos floating around. And generally the old OnLive user interface felt more solid, with fast responses, and also felt more organized though it didn't have to display so much information.

It will be interesting to see how the OnLive user interface will develop and of course the OnLive cloud gaming service at large.

Friday, 21 February 2014

Steve Perlman's pCell Wireless Technology Could Usher a Revolution in Navigation and Augmented Reality

In 2011 I uncovered the significance of Steve Perlman's DIDO wireless technology that he let slip in a presentation of OnLive at the Columbia Engineering School. Perlman has now, again at the Columbia University in New York, unveiled the fruits of his work on DIDO. The wireless technology is now officially called pCell and is compatible with LTE. Perlman has created a company named Artemis around this technology.

All the major news outlets have covered pCell so I won't rehash it. At the end of his Columbia presentation of pCell that you can see at the end of the article, Perlman again risked the disclosure of other projects that he's working on. He hinted that there are radical announcements to come from Artemis and that you can see one of them in the intro video that he showed at the presentation. You can view the pCell intro video below.

You don't even have to watch the video carefully to notice that this radical announcement is navigation and subsequently augmented reality. You can witness overlays that display information around buildings, cars and even people. A fully connected world.

Since the pCell technology can make out and position pCell radios to a precision of 1 cm, even in fast moving vehicles, this is the ultimate navigation tech. Imagine pCell radios being built into cars, drones, on building walls and inside buildings, on streets and under streets, and of course into people's mobiles or other wearables like Google Glass.

Enabling autonomous cars and drones suddenly sounds easy. You can follow every object that has pCell radios on it to a precision of 1 cm from kilometers away. You can cover buildings or moving objects with pCell radios, and see a 3D map of not only streets but even moving objects inside the world. The ultimate motion capture machine.

With pCell augmented reality can get reality, but it goes further. Not only can people see information overlaid over other people and the world around them. Suddenly autonomous machines can see the world and its motion in precision, the autonomous internet of things becomes reality. From there Skynet isn't far.

Sunday, 26 January 2014

NVIDIA Maxwell SteamOS Machine with up to 16 Denver CPU Cores and 1 Million Draw Calls

To date NVIDIA's upcoming Maxwell GPU architecture has been rumored to be coming with up to 8 NVIDIA custom designed Denver 64-bit ARM CPU cores. Well, a friendly mole from their cloud gaming division has let me know that they are mulling the option of equipping the highest-end Maxwell GPU with 16 Denver cores.

Are NVIDIA insane you ask? Well, it looks like they are insane with core numbers lately, the Tegra K1 mobile SoC being a great example. The Maxwell architecture is presumably so energy efficient that it allows NVIDIA to do such a chip with a TDP of around 225W. No wonder the Maxwell GTX 750 is rumored to need very low power. It's not yet clear if the chip will be manufactured on TSMC's 20nm line or the 16nm FinFET one. The latter would push the chip to 2015.

NVIDIA has been able to design the Denver architecture in such a way that it can be manufactured on the same die and process like their high-end GPU's. They somehow managed to architect Denver so that it can be efficiently manufactured on the same process required by high density GPUs. Presumably the trick is that Denver actually very closely resembles a GPU architecture, but has a very powerful instruction set translation unit.

As rumored, that translation unit has been first developed for NVIDIA's x86 project years ago after they licensed Transmeta technology. But then NVIDIA signed an lucrative agreement with Intel, and part of it was that they wouldn't develop hardware or software for x86. Since NVIDIA is an economic company they kept on developing their CPU architecture and steered the project towards the ARM 64-bit architecture. Actually their instruction set translation unit is very flexible and programmable, and can be relatively easily refurbished for other instruction sets. This is something that NVIDIA learned by developing Icera soft-modem technology for Tegra, and the experience developing the CUDA platform also helped.

Coming back to the integration of Maxwell and Denver. Not only can they be manufactured together on the same high-end GPU process, Denver can also be highly integrated into the Maxwell die. Imagine each Maxwell compute cluster having one Denver CPU core available. NVIDIA is even so proud of their achievement that they will maybe call the combination of a Maxwell and Denver compute cluster the Tesla Compute Core (TCC), and the whole chip could be named the Tesla Processing Unit (TPU) since it can run an operating system like Linux on its own. Of course the chip could also get a new name after some other famous scientist, or a superhero.

Did I mention Linux? Isn't SteamOS based on a Linux distro? It's not hard to guess what's coming now. Yeah, NVIDIA is working on SteamOS consoles, with the most powerful of them packing the 16 Denver cores toting Maxwell beast, the ultimate NVIDIA console SoC. The color scheme of NVIDIA's consoles is pretty much guaranteed to be black and green. The name of the new consoles is not yet decided, I don't think they will be called Shield, or will they?

Not only that, NVIDIA intends their SteamOS consoles to be reference platforms for other manufacturers who want to get into the console business the cheap way, just like the NVIDIA Tegra Note 7 and the NVIDIA Shield.

So just what is the 16 Denver cores toting Maxwell beast capable of? My source told me one number, 1 Million draw calls in DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.4. Just for reference, AMD claims that their upcoming low-level API Mantle will be able to issue up to 150,000 draw calls. Presumably NVIDIA's new hardware beast will be able to obliterate AMD's Mantle API, and this with no code changes required by game developers as it will all be done in hardware.

You ask yourself what game developer would need so many draw calls? This is the maximum number of draw calls that the 16 Denver cores enable, but they can be used for much more. NVIDIA is working on integrating the Denver CPU cores into their GameWorks code library that game developers can integrate freely into their games. They are porting the library to OpenGL and SteamOS.

So what can NVIDIA's new GameWorks library with Denver support do for game developers? For instance realistic physicalization of the whole game world or parts of it with the flick of a switch, including fluids, gases and particles. Advanced ray tracing algorithms. Advanced AI. Advanced data compression algorithms. Advanced adaptable LOD generation and tessellation. Advanced global illumination. Advanced streaming of assets for open world games. Sound processing on the level of AMD's TrueAudio, but programmable. The list goes on and on.

Maxwell with Denver is also a high-performance computing beast, and not only for Maxwell's double-precision floating-point improvements. And it can run Linux on its own, without Intel and AMD CPUs. So supercomputers like Titan that already includes NVIDIA Tesla GPUs and data centers could run on NVIDIA's hardware alone without relying on competitors' hardware. No wonder that NVIDIA would like to sell these new chips as Tesla Processing Units (TPUs).

It will be very interesting to follow what NVIDIA will unveil this year.

Sunday, 29 September 2013

Microsoft Actively Sabotaging PC Gaming with the Help of AMD - Valve the Saviour

I've learned from a friendly mole at Microsoft that they've silently gave the go ahead for AMD to release their low-level GPU access API Mantle for their Graphics Core Next (GCN) GPU architecture for PC. And not coincidentally, Mantle is very similar in form and function to the low-level API employed in Microsoft's upcoming Xbox One games console that uses AMD's GCN architecture, so that games developers can easily use most of their low-level code from the Xbone for AMD's GCN architecture on the PC side. Again with silent help from Microsoft, AMD is even working on a compiler that will simply port the low-level Xbone code to GCN on PC.

But, why is that bad you ask? Isn't low-level access to the metal something that PC games developers crave for years? Wouldn't that help PC gamers enjoy unparalleled performance on games compared to consoles? Is Microsoft good and wants to sing Kumbaya together with all gamers, be it on the Xbone or the PC?

One could think that Microsoft is so honest and naive that it thinks this could really pan out, but then if you think that, my fellow gamers, you are the naive.

How shall I put it? Microsoft currently deservedly enjoys the reputation from the press and gamers that they are the dark empire which wants to crush gamers' rights.

Well, the perfidious plan of the Microsoft head honchos is to let AMD do their thing and deploy Mantle for the launch of their new GPUs. So far so good. Here the evil starts... Microsoft knows that AMD is very desperate and continually taking a beating from Intel and NVIDIA on the CPU and GPU fronts. They can't do much about Intel on the CPU front, but they sure think that they can go against NVIDIA at the GPU front. AMD thinks Mantle is the knife, and they intend to ram it deep into NVIDIA's chest.

What a coincidence that AMD intends to reveal more about Mantle just before the new consoles launch at the 2013 AMD Developer Summit in November. Doesn't that reek of desperation? Judging by all the boasting of AMD firsts and bests at the AMD GPU '14 Tech Day in Hawaii where they showcased the upcoming Radeon R9 and R7 series of GPUs, self-esteem must currently be on a record low at the company.

Wouldn't it be for the arab oil money that was poured into AMD, cough... drained down into a bottomless pit and because Intel fears the US antitrust laws, I don't think the company would exist anymore in the fierce computer industry. One just has to look at the loses that the company took in the last years to see what an oddity such a company like AMD is.

Microsoft knows that NVIDIA is a clever company that has managed to adapt and survive countles battles in the harsh reality of the computing business environment with larger and arrogant companies like Intel and AMD. They know that NVIDIA will strike back fiercely at AMD and try to blow away their Mantle. I'm not so sure AMD, that live in their oil fueled lala land that apparently doesn't need profits to exist, knows that.

AMD wants to go against NVIDIA with a low-level GPU API, the same NVIDIA that fell and swallowed the goliath of low-level APIs back in the good ol' days of PC gaming, namely 3dfx with their legendary Glide API.

Nothing good can come of it for PC gaming. There will be chaos, there will be blood. And that's what the dark empire seeks. The return of the good old wild west days where PC gamers couldn't be sure if their shiny and expensive new GPU will even run the latest game in all its glory, if at all.

Now is the calm before the storm. Some might have noticed, NVIDIA is unusually quiet now when AMD announced Mantle and their new GPUs, though they usually have some product launch to steal AMD's thunder. Well, there are signs. Like Epic's Mark Rein tweeting that he saw the most amazing thing made by NVIDIA, and it's not a GPU, but gamers will love it. Could this be NVIDIA's low-level GPU API? Will they name it Glide?

The fragmentation of PC gaming, again. After Microsoft united PC gamers with DirectX, they now seek chaos. Microsoft has been on a crusade against PC gaming since they've launched their Xbox business. First passive-aggressively with the now axed Games for Windows - LIVE, then of course with the ever slowing development of DirectX that has currently come to a crawl, and we shouldn't forget the catastrophe that is Windows 8.

And now, could this help by Microsoft for AMD's Mantle be considered an active sabotage of the PC gaming landscape? The answer from Microsoft would surely be a passive-aggressive no.

How comes that Microsoft, a company with the market power and the legions of programmers and engineers, can't afford to build a standardized low-level API for GPUs that is part of DirectX and is interoperable with Direct3D? They are clearly able to do it for the Xbox, granted it's a bit trickier for PCs, but why couldn't such a colossus like Microsoft make it work in the PC space? Well, I answered those questions in the preceding text.

Could Valve be the saviour and unite PC gamers? They sure are applying a lot of pressure to Microsoft lately with various Steam related announcements, and as my mole at Microsoft tells me this has their head honchos worried. There is some paranoia there that by destroying PC gaming in favour of their Xbox business, Microsoft could play into Valve's cards and inadvertently slaughter their only cash cow, namely the Windows business.

No wonder that NVIDIA is lately so friendly to Linux and speaks highly of their partnership with Valve. AMD on the other side has refrained from mentioning anything related to SteamOS and distanced themselves from it.

There are certainly interesting times ahead with the possibility of tectonic shifts in the PC gaming landscape, and gaming in general.

Monday, 1 July 2013

OnLive Released Rogue Legacy to the Marketplace and PlayPack

Rogue Legacy was added to the OnLive marketplace as a PlayPass and to the OnLive PlayPack. The OnLive PlayPack is now at 254 games in the US, 253 games in the UK and 253 games in Belgium, and counting.

The game is priced at $14.99 in the US ($10.49 PlayPack discount), £11.99 in the UK (£8.39 PlayPack discount) and €13.99 in Belgium (€9.79 PlayPack discount).

Rogue Legacy is an indie action RPG platformer published and developed by Cellar Door Games.

Interestingly, OnLive engineer Michael Toy was one of the original developers of the original Rogue in 1980, so no wonder that Rogue Legacy released on OnLive day-and-date with other platforms.

Back in the early 1980s, the now legendary game, Rogue, literally defined a genre. Its unique place in gaming history as the blueprint for dungeon-based fantasy role-playing is still recognised today, and the new Rogue Legacy game does more than pay homage to its predecessor.

“Rogue Legacy makes brilliant use of permadeath and procedurally generated content to create a brutally fun game,” said Michael Toy, one of the co-creators of the original game and (coincidentally) part of the technical team at OnLive. “I’m thrilled to see that these features are being embraced by young developers.”

“We’re delighted to have Rogue Legacy on the service,” said Kevin Keating, Publisher Relations, OnLive. “OnLive’s unique spectating and social features mean great Indie games like this get fantastic traction and, through the players, the visibility they deserve.”

Rogue Legacy delivers the game to a new generation of players, this time in a highly addictive action-platformer style. The new game captures the essence of the original, including some of the features like procedurally generated levels and permadeath. The result is 100% pure game.

Rogue Legacy is a genealogical rogue-"LITE" where anyone can be a hero.

Each time you die, your child will succeed you. Every child is unique. One child might be colourblind, or they might have tourettes. They could even be a dwarf.

That's OK because no one's perfect, and you don't have to be perfect to win this game. But you do have to be pretty darn good because this game is HARD.

Fortunately every time you die, all the gold you've collected can be used to upgrade you manor, giving your next child a step up in life and another chance at vanquishing evil.

Here's what Rogue Legacy is:
  • A procedurally generated adventure. Explore new castles with every life.
  • Rogue-lite. Your character dies, but with each passing your lineage grows and becomes stronger.
  • Tons of unique traits that makes each playthrough special. Ever wanted to be a dyslexic giant? Now you can!
  • More than 8 classes to choose from (9)! Each class has unique abilities that change the way you play the game.
  • Over 60 different enemies to test your skills against. Hope you like palette-swaps!
  • Massive, expandable skill tree. Rack in the loot to upgrade your manor and give your successors a cutting edge.
  • Oh yeah, there's a Blacksmith and an Enchantress shop with tons of upgrades. Equip your heroes with powerful weaponry and armor. Or gain new abilities like flight, dash, and air jumping.
  • Tons of secrets and easter eggs to uncover... or are there? Yes there are.
  • Got a gamepad? Play with a gamepad.
  • Clowns.

Metascore: 87

You can play the free demo, subscribe to the PlayPack and buy Rogue Legacy for the US, the UK and Belgium powered by OnLive.